Monster is written more as personal notes and a screenplay for the theater than a novel. In this story, the reader meets sixteen-year- old Steve who is experiencing prison and a trial due to a robbery gone bad. Steve recounts the most recent time spent in jail along with the trial leading up to the jury's verdict. Supposedly, Steve and two other men entered a drug store intending to perform a robbery when the owner of the drugstore was accidentally shot and killed. Numerous witnesses arise that don't seem to have direct encounters of what actually happened inside the drug store. Steve ends up being declared not guilty.
The wording used at the end used imagery that resonated with me. When the jury declares Steve not guilty, he reaches out to hug his attorney, who didn't really seem to trust Steve the entire time. The attorney walks away dismissing the hug leaving Steve to look like "some strange beast, a monster." He fought so hard the entire story to not be portrayed this way, but the lingering image is still the monster.
I would love to see this story acted out in a high school theater program. Students could learn about creating a screenplay with imagery that would leave the readers/viewers wanting more. Similar events to the one in this story have been seen on the news in recent years. Young adult readers would be able to better relate with real life characters.
Myers, W.D. (1999). Monster. New York: Harper.